Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Monsanto

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 29, 1988No. 436, Docket 87-1397PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:

This is an expedited interlocutory appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert J. Ward, Judge, denying a motion to vacate or modify an ex parte post-indictment restraining order entered by John F. Keenan, Judge, pursuant to a provision of the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984 (“CFA”), 21 U.S.C. § 853(e)(1)(A) (Supp. Ill 1985). The restraining order prohibits defendant Peter Monsanto from alienating or in any way depreciating two parcels of real property that were specified in an indictment as “constituting…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Peter MonsantoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Joseph A. Kirschenbaum, A/K/A Ari Kirschenbaum, Appeal Of: Julie KirschenbaumCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API