Legal Opinion
Muck v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 27, 1993No. 92-1271PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff Ronald P. Muck appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States regarding his tax liability under 26 U.S.C. § 6672, 791 F.Supp. 817. Because we agree with the district court that plaintiff was at all relevant times a “responsible person” under the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anthony A. Calderone, Clark Hornbaker, Plaintiffs-Counterclaim Defendants v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Oliver v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Garcia-Paz v. Swift Textiles, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- United States v. Thomas E. Iverson, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Finley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.