Homer v. Grosholz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Cross-Appeals from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The principal facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The amount of indebtedness secured by the deed of trust of the 18th of February, 1867, from Ilusgen to Homer was about $24,000, of which about $20,000 was due to Homer, aud the remainder to other parties, most of whom were foreigners.
1Opinion of the CourtG-rason, J.
These are cross-appeals from an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, over-ruling exceptions of *525Homer to an auditor’s account, and finally ratifying the account, Homer appealing because he was not allowed the full amount of his claim under the mortgage of the 26th day of August, 1868, and Gfrosholz and Coquentin appealing first, because they were not allowed the whole proceeds of the sale of the merchandise, purchased of them by Husgen ; and second, because -Homer was allowed to participate in the distribution of said proceeds of sale with the other creditors of Husgen.
On Homer’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Williams v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Alexander v. WalterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
- Shepherd v. BevinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850
- Wolfe v. HauverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1843
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Koogle v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Bramble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Potomac Dredging Co. v. SmootCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Christy v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.