Pistorino & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[Per Curiam.]
Appeal from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 81 Cust. Ct. 37, C.D. 4763, 461 F. Supp. 331 (1978). The court held that plaintiff (appellant) had not overcome the presumption of correctness of the classification of the imported figures as “models” under TSUS item 737.15, and had not proven correct its claimed classification as “charts” under TSUS 273.35.
Upon thorough consideration of the record, briefs, and oral arguments, we are in full agreement with the opinion of Judge Maletz and adopt it as our own, adding only the following comments.
*96Appellant’s contention that “use is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pistorino & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Associated Hobby Mfrs., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Hudson Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- Polk's Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Austin Chemical Company, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Clipper Belt Lacer Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.