Legal Opinion

Behrens v. Kirkgard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from District Court, Dallas County; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Action by S. Kirkgard against F. L. Beh-rens and others. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

[1, 2] This suit was brought by defendant in error, Kirkgard, against the plaintiffs in error, to recover on a vendor’s lien note executed by J. M. Hail, and payable to F. L. Behrens and Irby Walton. The note was transferred several times, finally reaching Kirkgard, who is now the owner. The indorsers were made parties, who pleaded a verbal understanding as to themselves that they were not to be personally liable as in-dorsers, and further to the effect that the form of their indorsement on their faces imports only a transfer of the title to the notes, and does not impose upon them any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martin v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Cresap v. ManorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Markey v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Hatch v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. Sears v. Lantz & BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. WT Burton Company v. Keown Contracting CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Rattan v. DickerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Divelbiss v. BurnsMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Fay v. WitteNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Tarver v. GodseyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API