People v. Collins
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Appellant Collins was convicted of selling alcoholic liqnor in no-license territory in supervisorial district No. 5, county of Tehama, and he appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial. [1] His prosecution was under what is known as the Wyllie Act- (Stats. 1911, p. 599), and one of his main contentions is' that this statute was superseded and rendered inoperative by the National Prohibition Act known as the Volstead Act (Act Cong. Oct. 28, 1919, e. 85, 41 Stat. 305), and therefore the conviction was void. In answer to this claim it is sufficient to refer to In…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re VolpiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Ex parte CrookshankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re PolizzottoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. CapelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- In Re AjuriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re BrysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- In Re ToselloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922