Legal Opinion

In Re Bryson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1933No. Docket No. 151Published

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

The petitioner was charged by complaint with two violations of what is commonly called the Wyllie Local Option Law (Stats. 1911, p. 599). In the first count it was charged that on the twenty-eighth day of March, 1933, within the city of Visalia, county of Tulare, the petitioner, in violation of the law referred to, sold certain described alcoholic liquor containing more than one per cent of alcohol by volume. In a second count it was charged that on the same day and in the same place he violated the same law in that he unlawfully had in his possession another described quantity of alcoholic…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. In Re MingoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Christy v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Railroad Commission v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Earle v. Board of Education of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API