Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1972No. 61PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

In her appeal from the District Court to the Court of Appeals, plaintiff asserted that Judge Webb erred (1) by ordering her to answer the interrogatories, and (2) by ordering that she, the child and defendant submit to a blood-grouping test. The Court of Appeals made no ruling in respect of the order requiring plaintiff to answer the interrogatories. It reversed the order for the blood-grouping test.

Order Requiring Answers to Interrogatories

G.S. 50-16.6(a) provides: “Alimony or alimony pendente lite shall not be payable when adultery is pleaded in bar of demand for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Powell v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Powell v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. CampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Withrow v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Freeman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Wright v. GannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API