Freeman v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff has assigned errors to the admission of evidence and to the denial of his motions for directed verdict and judgment not withstanding the verdict. We have carefully reviewed each assignment of error and find no prejudicial error.
Plaintiff first assigns error to the admission of the following testimony elicited from his wife by the defendant:
Q. State whether or not he ever made threats to you?
MR. MORGAN: OBJECTION, husband and wife privilege, Your Honor.
Court: Overruled.
A. Yes.
Q. State whether or not he’s ever threatened to burn the house down.
Mr. Hall: Object.
Court:…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hicks v. HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Stone v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- State v. MayhandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- McCoy v. . JusticeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. NamerowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Federated Mutual Insurance v. Williams Trull Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- O-So Detroit, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Dual State Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Yassoo Enterprises, Inc. v. North Carolina Joint Underwriting Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.