State ex rel. Bayless v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
To successfully assert a VSSR, a claimant must establish that the employer’s violation of a specific safety requirement proximately caused his or her injury. State, ex rel. Haines, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 15, 58 O.O. 2d 70, 278 N.E. 2d 24. Appellant opposes the commission’s factual determination and its failure to rule on the issue of employer noncompliance. Neither challenge has merit.
As to the former, resolution of disputed factual situations lies with the commission. State, ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1956), *150166 Ohio St. 47, 1 O.O. 2d 190, 139…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. Haines v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Watson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Lovell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Lovell v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. US Tubular Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State ex rel. Byington Builders, Ltd. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State Ex Rel. Quality Stamping Products v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.