Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Lovell v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1996No. 1994-0864PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 74 Ohio St.3d 250.] THE STATE EX REL. LOVELL, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Lovell v. Indus. Comm.,

1996-Ohio-321.] Workers’ compensation—Application for additional compensation based on violation of specific safety requirement—Industrial Commission’s denial of application not an abuse of discretion when claimant fails to establish that the lack of a prescribed safety device proximately caused his injury. (No. 94-864—Submitted October 24, 1995—Decided January 10, 1996.) APPEAL from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Burton v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Fultz v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. DeMint v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Lovell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. NHVS Internatl., Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State ex rel. US Tubular Prods., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State Ex Rel. Consol. Coal Co. v. Alexander, Unpublished Decision (8-1-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Brahler v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API