Legal Opinion

Notch Mountain Corp. v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 26, 1995No. 94SC325PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rovira

We granted certiorari in Elliott v. Notch Mountain Corp., 881 P.2d 434 (Colo. App.1994), to decide whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a severed mineral estate and a reservation in a surface estate constitutes an “equitable interest” sufficient to exercise a right of redemption pursuant to section 39-12-103(1), 16B C.R.S. (1994).

We hold that the right of a severed mineral interest owner to use a reasonable amount of the surface estate for mineral development does not constitute an interest sufficient for such owner to exercise statutory redemption rights in a severed surface…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chartiers Block Coal Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. O'BRIEN v. Village Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Mitchell v. EspinosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gerrity Oil & Gas Corp. v. MagnessSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Dove Valley Business Park Associates, Ltd. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. McCormick v. Union Pacific Resources Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. Michaelson v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API