Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Espinosa

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 17, 1952No. 16566PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

*269We will herein refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiffs in error were defendants, and defendants in error were plaintiffs, or by name.

The action was instituted under the provisions of Rule 105 (a) R.C.P. Colo., for the purpose of obtaining a complete adjudication of the rights of the parties in and to real estate consisting of 160 acres of land in La Plata county, Colorado. The several parties, plaintiffs and defendants, claimed interests in the oil and gas underlying the surface of said land, under circumstances which will hereafter more fully appear.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Co. v. Wyoming AgencyWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Calvat v. JuhanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Washburn v. Gregory Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Sims v. VosburgNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Skelly Oil Company v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Radke v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  3. Notch Mountain Corp. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Grynberg v. City of NorthglennSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. McCormick v. Union Pacific Resources Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API