Legal Opinion

Michigan Township Participating Plan v. Pavolich

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1999No. Docket 205214PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court granted summary disposition to defendant pursuant to MCR 2.116(I)(2) in this declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff appeals as of right, arguing that the trial court incorrectly determined that defendant was insured under the policy at issue. We reverse and remand.

The parties agree to the underlying facts of this case:

On June 11, 1994, [defendant] was employed as a police officer with the Village of Lake Linden. While on duty, [defendant] stopped to question Ronald Jutila whom he suspected of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquors. During…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Raska v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance v. McKeeTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. TMW Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Old Kent Bank v. SobczakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. AES-Apex Employer Servs. v. Dino RotondoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API