Legal Opinion

AES-Apex Employer Servs. v. Dino Rotondo

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 17, 2019No. 17-2068/17-2211PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THAPAR, Circuit Judge.

*861 Dino Rotondo serves as a consultant for AES-Apex. This case is a dispute about who gets the money that he makes consulting. The IRS says that it should get the money because Rotondo is behind on his taxes. Akouri Investments says it should get the money instead because Akouri loaned Rotondo money that he has not paid back yet. And finally, AES-Apex says that it should get to keep some of the money pursuant to its contract with Rotondo. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the IRS, and we affirm.

I

As relevant here, Dino Rotondo was the sole owner of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Vicki Linneman v. Vita-Mix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Diana Jomaa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Lipman v. BudishDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
  4. ADA-ES, Inc. v. Big Rivers Electric CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
  5. Adu-Beniako v. ReimannDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API