Legal Opinion

Truman, Hooker, & Co. v. Owens

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jackson County.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This was an action upon an account stated.

The complaint contained the usual allegations of an account stated, all of which was specially denied by the answer. Upon the trial, in consequence of a failure of evidence, the court, upon motion, instructed the jury to render a verdict for the defendants, and the jury returned a verdict for the defendants.

The errors alleged are, in sustaining objections of defendant’s counsel to the introduction of the account and order, as evidence of an account stated, and in directing the jury to return a verdict for the defendants.

It appears by the bill of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Volkening v. . DegraafNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Stenton v. . JeromeNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vanbebber v. PlunkettOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Steinmetz v. GrennonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Daytona Bridge Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Florida · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API