Legal Opinion

Vanbebber v. Plunkett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1895PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from Benton: J. C. Fullerton, Judge. Action by L. Vanbebber against James and Asbnab Plunkett as for an account stated. At the trial in the court below, when plaintiff had rested his case, upon motion of defendant Ashnah Plunkett a judgment of nonsuit was rendered in her favor from which the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Wolverton.

The evidence offered tended to show that on or about the thirteenth day of January, eighteen hundred and *563eighty-six, the plaintiff exchanged with defendants a sixty-eight-acre tract of land for a certain other sixty-eight-acre tract belonging to the defendant Ashnah Plunkett; that there was a difference in the value of the said tracts in plaintiff’s favor; and that for the purpose of making up said difference the defendants agreed to build and construct for plaintiff about three fourths of a mile of fencing, sixty to eighty rods of which was to be of boards and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Volkening v. . DegraafNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Chace v. TraffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Grant v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Herbert v. DufurOregon Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Farrin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Fire Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Serles v. SerlesOregon Supreme Court · 1899

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API