Legal Opinion

Steinmetz v. Grennon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1923PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

A better understanding of the controversy may be had if the outstanding admitted facts are first related. The defendant had been conducting in Klamath Falls a butcher-shop known as the People’s Market. The plaintiff had been conducting a butcher-shop sometimes designated in the record as the Hawxhurst Market and at other times referred to as the Fach Market. It is conceded that at some time before or about February 8, 1919, the parties entered into an agreement, but the plaintiff and defendant differ sharply as to the terms of the agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, whatever it was,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Heinrich v. EnglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Bouslog v. GarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Crawford v. HutchinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Mine & Smelter Supply Co. v. Parke & Lacy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Field v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Edwards, Guardian v. HoevetOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cooley v. RomanOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Sunshine Dairy v. Jolly JoanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Halvorson v. Blue Mountain Prune Growers CooperativeOregon Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API