Legal Opinion
Interstate Casualty Co. v. Stewart
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 2, 1922No. 3 Div. 584PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was on a policy of “indemnity insurance.” Defendant pleaded in short by consent the general issue, with leave to give in evidence any matter that might be specially pleaded, with like leave of reply on plaintiff’s part. The case was tried without a jury, and resulted in a verdict for plaintiff.
Plaintiff’s action was to recover damages for injury to a Ford automobile, alleged in the complaint to have been caused solely by being in collision with a stationary object, to wit, a bank or mound of dirt, which automobile and its operating equipment the defendant had insured against damage…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Moblad v. Western Indemnity Co. of DallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Hardenbergh v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CartmelSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Continental Casualty Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Bruener v. Twin City Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. American Compounding Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.