Hardenbergh v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from, a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, entered upon a verdict directed by the court in favor of the plaintiff after both parties had moved for the direction of a verdict, and from an order denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The action is upon an insurance policy to recover damages to an automobile. That portion of *523the policy upon which the recovery was based provides : ‘ ‘ This policy * * * is extended to indemnify the assured against loss or damage to * * * the automobiles herein described * * * if caused solely by collision with another object either moving or stationary (excluding however * * * all loss or damage caused by striking any portion of the roadbed or by striking street or steam railway rails or ties, and all loss or damage caused by the upset of the insured automobile, unless such upset is a direct…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Bell v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Universal Service Co. v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PettidArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Continental Casualty Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.