Legal Opinion

Nichols v. Goldston

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1950No. 244PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The defendant, appellant, challenges here the correctness of the judgment overruling his demurrer, solely upon the ground that on the facts alleged in the complaint, accepted as true for purpose of considering the demurrer, plaintiff’s remedy is by motion in the cause in the former action, and not by this independent action.

No direct authority is cited by the defendant to sustain his position. The authorities cited are distinguishable in factual situations. But in the light of the authority of the judge, and of the relative legal rights of the parties, at the time and under the circumstances…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Belding v. ArcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  3. Causey v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Craven v. . MungerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Eames v. Armstrong.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TarbleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Green ex rel. Crudup v. KearnyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Lowe v. TarbleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API