Eames v. Armstrong.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by Richard Eames against O. A. Armstrong and others, heard by Judge M. H. Justice and a jury, at May Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of RowaN County. From a judgment for the plaintiff the defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This is an action for damages in a breach of covenant in a deed conveying land. The covenants sued on are set ont in section 3 of tbe complaint as follows: “Tbat tbe said deed so made, executed and delivered as aforesaid, contained covenants in substance as follows: 'And tbe said parties of tbe first part (i. e., tbe said C. A. Armstrong and wife, N. J. Armstrong, tbe defendants in tbis action) covenant tbat they are seized of tbe premises (i. e., tbe lands described in said deed and in tbis complaint) in fee, and bave right to convey tbe same in fee-simple; tbat tbe same are free and clear…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baruch v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Falls of Neuse Manufacturing Co. v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Fraley v. MarchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
- Phillips v. . HolmesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rose's Stores, Inc. v. Tarrytown Center, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Causey v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Craven v. . MungerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Perry v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Harris Clay Co. v. Carolina China Clay Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.