Lowe v. Tarble
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
I
Defendants contend that N.C.G.S. 24-5 violates their substantive due process rights under the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States and article I, section 19 of the Constitution of North Carolina. Defendants argue that N.C.G.S. 24-5 is not a fundamentally fair statute, that it is unreasonable, and that the statute has no substantial or rational relation to legislative objectives. Substantive due process is a guaranty against arbitrary legislation, demanding that the law be substantially related to the valid object sought to be obtained. State v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Meads v. North Carolina Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.