Legal Opinion
Roman v. Abrams
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 9, 1987No. Nos. 91, 242, Dockets 85-2191, 85-2343PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
These appeals, consolidated for argument, present questions concerning the propriety of a state prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to exclude White persons from the petit jury before which petitioners Michael Roman and Harold Schreiber, who are White, were jointly tried. In No. 85-2191, respondent New York Attorney General Robert Abrams appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, entered after an evidentiary hearing before Charles L. Brieant, Jr., Judge, now Chief Judge, conditionally granting the petition of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Forte, FrederickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Peter Grassia v. Charles Scully, Superintendent of Green Haven Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Oscar ClemonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.