Legal Opinion

In Re San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1942No. Civ. 2660PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal ~rom a judgment entered in a proceeding brought under section 403 of the Civil Code.

We will refer to the San Joaquin Light and Power Cor poration as San Joaquin and to Pacific Gas and Electric Company as Pacific. For many years prior to the time in question San Joaquin was a public utility supplying electricity, gas and water to consumers in Fresno and other counties. In August, 1938, it began proceedings to dissolve voluntarily and wind up its affairs as provided for in sections 400 et seq. of the Civil Code. About 89 per cent of its outstanding stock was then owned and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. Missouri-Edison Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Ervin v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886
  4. Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Greyhound Corp. v. Division 1384 of Amalgamated Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re Security Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Fortner v. CornellIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Mayellen Apartments, Inc. v. PacmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API