Legal Opinion

Fortner v. Cornell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1945No. 7222PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

The material allegations of appellant’s amended complaint as amended are in substance: that on or about February 1st to 7th, 1926, the stockholders of respondent corporation, Oakes and Company, adopted a resolution providing for the application of the assets of the company to the payment and retirement of its stock, which was to some extent and for a time carried out; that the number of shares of stock were variously increased and de creased at different corporate meetings until August 26, 1931, when a resolution of the board of directors ordered a reduction to 90 shares, then stated in said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Morton v. Morton Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Chemung Mining Co. v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Riley v. Callahan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Central Ry. Signal Co. v. LongdenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Pincock v. Pocatello Gold & Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Rivera v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API