Fortner v. Cornell
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
The material allegations of appellant’s amended complaint as amended are in substance: that on or about February 1st to 7th, 1926, the stockholders of respondent corporation, Oakes and Company, adopted a resolution providing for the application of the assets of the company to the payment and retirement of its stock, which was to some extent and for a time carried out; that the number of shares of stock were variously increased and de creased at different corporate meetings until August 26, 1931, when a resolution of the board of directors ordered a reduction to 90 shares, then stated in said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pollitz v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Morton v. Morton Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Chemung Mining Co. v. HanleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Riley v. Callahan Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Central Ry. Signal Co. v. LongdenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Pincock v. Pocatello Gold & Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Rivera v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.