Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Bottomley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 6, 1932:

Fairchild, J.

The special verdict is criticised by appellant because certain questions proper in scope are so worded as to carry an impression that there was a failure to operate an automobile on its proper side of the road. But the verdict contained similar questions with respect to both the appellant and the respondent and studiously refrained from emphasizing the possible fault of either. This balancing of disadvantages was made possible in this case because there was submitted to the jury the claim of respondent and the counterclaim of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Swarthout v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Patitucci v. GerhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Johnson v. PrideauxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Allen v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lambert v. WrenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Heifetz v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. United States Guarantee Co. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API