Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Corporation Commission v. . Murphey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 10, 1929PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1ConcurrenceStacy, C. J.
BROGDEN, J., concurs with opinion in which CLARKSON, J., concurs. This is a motion made by the petitioner, D. S. Murphey, upon a special appearance, in a proceeding for the liquidation of an insolvent banking corporation, organized and doing business under the laws of this State. The proceeding was begun on 28 May, 1928, and is now prosecuted in the Superior Court of Duplin County by the Corporation Commission of the State under and pursuant to the provisions of chapter 113, Public Laws 1927.
The petitioner, D. S. Murphey, challenges the validity of an assessment made against him in said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Reetz v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Hood v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Oliver v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . HoldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Corporation Commission of North Carolina v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.