Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Ramirez
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided June 2, 2000No. 82,463PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Six, J.:
This declaratory judgment action questions the amount of insurance coverage available to insure Dr. Augusto Ramirez for professional negligence. The insurance providers are defendants Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance Company (KaMMCO) and the Kansas Health Care Stabilization Fund (the Fund). The case arises out of the medical treatment of plaintiff Michael R. Wilson. In an underlying failure to diagnose/loss of chance of survival medical malpractice action, Wilson claims five separate and distinct injuries over approximately a 21-month period.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- D'Auria v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- City of Wichita v. 200 South Broadway, Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Kansas Commission on Civil Rights v. HowardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Stonewall InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Kansas Health Care Stabilization Fund v. St. Francis HospitalCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Medical Protective Co. v. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Ass'nDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009