Legal Opinion

In re Aratana Therapeutics Inc. Sec. Litig.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided June 11, 2018No. 17 Civ. 880 (PAE)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

In this putative class action arising under the federal securities laws, lead plaintiffs Joseph Bessent, John Corbitt, and Eric Pearson claim that animal pharmaceutical company Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. ("Aratana") and two of its officers, Steven St. Peter and Craig A. Tooman, made false and misleading statements or omissions regarding the future commercial availability of "ENTYCE," an appetite stimulant for dogs. Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit on behalf of all persons (other than defendants) who purchased Aratana securities between March 16, 2015 and March…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ok. Firefighters Pension And Retirement v. LexmarkDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. In re Barrick Gold Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Altimeo Asset Management v. Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  4. Bratusov v. ComScore, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Chauhan v. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API