Ok. Firefighters Pension And Retirement v. Lexmark
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, Senior United States District Judge:
Defendants Lexmark International, Inc. ("Lexmark" or "the Company"), Paul A. Rooke, David Reeder, and Gary Stromquist (the "Individual Defendants," and collectively with Lexmark, the "Defendants") move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint ("Complaint") in this putative securities fraud class action. For the reasons that follow, Defendants' motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
The allegations in the Complaint are presumed true on this motion. The putative class includes all persons and…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Gagnon v. Alkermes PLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Allison v. Oak Street Health, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Barrett Brownbridge, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. TFI International Inc., Alain Bédard, and David SapersteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Boston Retirement System v. Alexion Pharmaceuticals IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Bratusov v. ComScore, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.