Legal Opinion
Hill v. White
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 25, 1991No. 90-934PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
In this appeal from a summary judgment order entered in an action to determine the lawful heirs of a decedent’s estate, appellants argue that the trial judge’s grant of appellees’ motion for summary judgment was improper because a genuine issue regarding a material fact remained in dispute. After considering the materials arrayed in support of summary judgment in the light most favorable to appellants, we conclude that there is no remaining fact in issue that requires a trial for resolution. We therefore sustain the order of the trial judge.
I
James Guión 1 died in 1987…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Bown v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Clay Properties, Inc. v. Washington Post Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Joyner v. Sibley Memorial HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.