Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2013No. 10-CF-1001PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

After a jury trial, appellant Robert Young was convicted of kidnapping and rape based on an FBI examiner’s testimony that his DNA profile matched the DNA profile of the rapist. On appeal, Young argues that the trial court committed reversible error under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment when it allowed the government to present this testimony without calling as witnesses the laboratory scientists who derived and identified the two DNA profiles and performed the calculations on which the testifying examiner based her conclusions. In addition, Young…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State of Tennessee v. Jessie DotsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Smith v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  4. Paredes, Jovany JampherCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API