Legal Opinion
Theut v. Aramark Corporation
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 13, 2020No. 2:18-cv-02593Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Paul Theut, No. CV-18-02593-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Aramark Corporation, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue is Defendants Aramark Corporation and Aramark Sports and Entertainment 16 Services’ (“Aramark”) Motion for Leave to File Amended Answers, Including Third-Party 17 Claims against the Estate of Jeffrey Darland (Doc. 109). Nonparty Estate of Jeffrey Darland 18 (“Estate”) filed a Response (Doc. 110) and also filed a Motion to Permissively Intervene 19 for the Limited Purpose of Opposing…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 450 SEL, VIN 11603302064538Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Stewart v. American International Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CPT Medical Services, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Zero Tolerance Entertainment, Inc. v. FergusonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.