Legal Opinion
Zero Tolerance Entertainment, Inc. v. Ferguson
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 10, 2008No. CV 06-4132-RCPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*125PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SHAUN FERGUSON’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE IMPLEADER
ROSALYN H. CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On September 26, 2008, defendant Shaun Ferguson dba Adults Allowed filed a notice of motion and motion for leave to file an impleader (“Motion”) and a supporting memorandum of points and authorities with exhibits, including the parties’ stipulation allowing the filing of an impleader and the proposed impleader. On October 8, 2008, plaintiff filed non-opposition to defendant’s motion. This matter is decided in Chambers without oral argument…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 450 SEL, VIN 11603302064538Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kim v. FujikawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC v. Suns Legacy Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- KBL CORP. v. ArnoutsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- UL LLC v. Space Chariot Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Abbott v. Sodexo Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Anderson v. Sodexo Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.