Legal Opinion

Simon v. Rossier

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1956No. 1848, 1849PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

The Rossiers sued Simon for the return of a deposit of $547.50 made by them on a contract for the purchase of a house and also for punitive damages because of Simon’s alleged fraud in connection with the making of the contract. A jury returned a verdict for the Rossiers for $547.50 plus $500 for each of them as punitive damages. The trial court granted Simon’s motion for judgment n. o. v. with respect to punitive damages, but allowed the verdict for return of the deposit to stand. Both parties have appealed.

The Rossiers say it was error to set aside the verdict as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Horning v. FergusonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Meredith v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Securities Corporation v. FranklinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Sankin v. 5410 Connecticut Avenue CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
  3. Millard v. Lorain Investment CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API