Legal Opinion

Meredith v. Fitzgerald

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 1, 1955No. 1593PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellees Fitzgerald and Sweeney, trustees under a second deed of trust on certain real estate, advertised the property for sale subject to a first deed of trust. The terms of sale were all cash above the first trust, with a deposit of $500, and terms of sale “to be complied with within thirty days, otherwise deposit forfeited * * Appellant Meredith was the successful bidder at the sale and made the required deposit. Thereafter it was discovered that there were certain liens of the United States against the property and the trustees were unable to convey title as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Meredith v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Simon v. RossierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API