Legal Opinion
Millard v. Lorain Investment Corporation
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1962No. 2997PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Appellee instituted this action to recover the balance due on ,a promissory note executed by appellants for the purchase of an automobile from Ross Discount Motors, Inc. Appellants answered alleging that the note was obtained by fraud and misrepresentation, that appellee was not a holder in due course, and that the note was the product of usury. By counterclaim appellants sought rescission and restitution of the amount paid on the note and punitive damages for fraud, alleging a close business affinity between appellee and Ross Discount Motors, Inc. At the conclusion of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Securities Corporation v. FranklinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
- Horning v. FergusonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Campbell Music Co. v. SingerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953
- F. H. Smith Co. v. LowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Kent Homes, Incorporated v. FrankelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dresser v. Sunderland Apartments Tenants Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mariner Water Renaturalizer of Washington, Inc. v. Aqua Purification Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Mills v. Cosmopolitan Ins. Agcy., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dean v. GarlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- R & A, INC. v. Kozy Korner, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.