Health & Tennis Corp. of America v. Jackson
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This appeal is from an order certifying a class pursuant to rule 42 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellant raises seven points of error asserting that the trial court abused its discretion in certifying the class and urging that appellees’ counsel must be disqualified. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellee Jackson 1 alleges that the facts are as follows: Jackson told a salesperson for Bally’s (predecessor to appellant Health & Tennis Corporation) that he wanted to work out at Bally’s health club on a month-to-month basis and that he did not want to enter a contract. The salesperson told him that…
3Cases cited22 opinions
- Weatherly v. Deloitte & Touche, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
- Microsoft Corp. v. Manning, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
- Anderson Producing Inc. v. Koch Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Ayres v. CanalesTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Life Insurance Co. of Southwest v. BristerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by54 opinions
- Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Southwestern Refining Co., Inc. v. BernalTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Ford Motor Co. v. SheldonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Intratex Gas Co. v. BeesonTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Central Power & Light Co. v. City of San Juan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.