Legal Opinion

State v. Long

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1994No. 9320SC413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We note that defendant brings forth twenty assignments of error but sets out only eight in his brief. Pursuant to Rule 28(a) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure, defendant’s remaining assignments of error are taken as abandoned.

In assignments of error 5, 9, and 10, defendant argues that the trial court erred by excluding evidence of threats made by the victim against defendant which tended to support his claim of self-defense. However, this Court cannot review the propriety of the trial court’s exclusion of evidence when the record fails to disclose the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. State v. AhearnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Handy v. PPG IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. RotenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API