Legal Opinion

Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. Heisel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1882PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Error to Kent. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Mrs. Heisel sued tlie railroad company for damages by reason of injury to her occupancy of certain premises owned by her on which she lives within the city of Grand Rapids. The land is used for dwelling-house purposes, containing a dwelling and outhouses, at the corner of .Second and West Division streets, being one hundred feet on each of those streets. Most of the neighboring property is used for various business purposes. The railroad which is the source of the injury is laid on West Division street, and by means of a main and a side track occupies the portion of the street adjacent to her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. White v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Harlow v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Smith v. LockMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Ranck v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Johnstone v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In Re Widening of Bagley AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API