Legal Opinion

City of Coffeyville v. Metcalf

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1931No. 30,160PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by the city to recover from its water and light collector, and the surety on his bond, money alleged to have been collected and not paid to the city treasurer. Plaintiff recovered, and defendants appeal.

The city of Coffeyville owned a system of waterworks. The statute provided that the board of city commissioners should maintain, manage, conduct and control the waterworks and make all ordinances, rules and regulations necessary for efficient management. The statute also provided for appointment of a superintendent of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Atchison Grain Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. McMullen v. Winfield Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Pickens v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Perry v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Wesley Hospital & Nurse Training SchoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Regier v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Graham v. UpdegraphSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Green v. BurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  5. Gates v. Kansas Farmers' Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API