Nelson v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.
The defendant, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled the motions and in this we can see no error.
In Rhyne v. Insurance Co., 196 N. C., 717, Stacey, C. J., speaking for a unanimous Court, citing numerous authorities, said, at p. 718: “It is considered by a majority of the courts that a stipulation in a contract of insurance requiring the assured, after suffering injury or illness, to perform some act, such as furnishing to the company proof of the injury or disability…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
- McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- Rhyne v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Whitaker v. . HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- In Re Will of BroachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gorham v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Woodell v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Blassingame v. Southern Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Gorham v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Walters v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.