Legal Opinion
Woodell v. Ætna Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 30, 1938PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
"While giving due consideration to the able argument of counsel for tbe defendant to tbe contrary, we are of tbe opinion that this ease is controlled by the principles laid down in Nelson v. Ins. Co., 199 N. C., 443, 154 S. E., 752; Rhyne v. Ins. Co., 196 N. C., 717, 147 S. E., 6; ibid., 199 N. C., 419, 154 S. E., 749; and Rand v. Ins. Co., 206 N. C., 760, 174 S. E., 749.
In the Nelson case, supra, the clause relating to the furnishing of proof and payment of benefits read as follows: “If . . . the insured shall furnish to the company due proof of an irrevocable loss . . . the company, by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grabbs v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Comstock v. Fraternal Accident Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Rhyne v. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Rhyne v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Allgood v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Chavis v. Southern Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Kirkley v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Akzona, Inc. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.