Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel Sosa and Julio Argumedo
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 15, 1967No. 15810, 15811PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Chief Judge.
These are two appeals from convictions of Samuel Sosa and Julio Argu-medo, on an indictment charging them with conspiracy to deal in narcotics, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C.A. § 174, following a bench trial by the district court. Each was sentenced to serve a term of six years imprisonment.
On appeal, Sosa contends the trial court erred in failing to produce an informant and in not giving him ample time to interview the informant. He also urges he was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
In his appeal, Argumedo contends he was entrapped and that the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- United States v. Millpax, Inc., a Corporation, and Roy F. Paxton, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Orlando Vasquez CarrionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- United States v. AdemajCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Martin Medina TapiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Santano Coronel-Quintana, A/K/A Santana Coronel-Quintana, United States of America v. Inocencio CoronelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State, in Interest of RrSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.