Legal Opinion
United States v. Millpax, Inc., a Corporation, and Roy F. Paxton, an Individual
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 21, 1963No. 13752_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
Defendants, Millpax, Inc., and Roy F. Paxton, were found guilty after trial by jury on three counts of a five-count indictment charging them with the misbranding of a drug known as “Millrue,” in that its labeling failed to bear adequate directions for use, as required by Section 502(f) (1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended, 21 U.S.C. § 352(f) (1), and with causing the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of such preparation, so labeled, in violation of Section 301(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 331 (a), which prohibits the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. Sferas (Two Cases). United States v. SkallyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Miguel Moran Ramirez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. George F. VasenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Billy G. ByersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Dorothy JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Article . Consisting of 216Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Samuel Sosa and Julio ArgumedoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- Hanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.