Legal Opinion
United States v. Ademaj
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 7, 1999No. 97-2352PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Fredi Ademaj challenges various district court rulings relating to his trial and conviction on three counts of distributing cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and two counts of conspiring to distribute cocaine, see id. § 846. We affirm the district court judgment in all respects.
I
BACKGROUND
The evidence showed that Ademaj had been involved in a wholesale cocaine distribution operation in the Boston area. During May 1996 the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) began using a cooperating witness, nicknamed “Bob,” to investigate Stefanos Meraklis, Ademaj’s…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Breard v. PruettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. ChanthadaraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Juan Chaparro-Alcantara and Jaime Romero-BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Morales-MaderaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BalsamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.