Legal Opinion

Shell Western E&P, Inc. v. Dolores County Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1997No. 96SC150PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The principal question presented by this case is whether the owner of gas wells subject to an ad valorem tax based solely on mineral production value, which owner has failed to give the county assessor the notice of production mandated by statute, may avoid its tax obligations by asserting a statute of limitations defense against the county. 1 We hold that the running of the statute of limitations is equitably tolled and the tax obligation may not be avoided.

We therefore affirm the court of appeals; however, we do so on grounds different from its rationale. We conclude that the statute of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. BrockampSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Continental Title Co. v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. HartmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Olson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Cahill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re LarsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  5. Cork v. Sentry InsuranceColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API