Legal Opinion
Ficarra v. Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of Insurance
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided March 22, 1993No. Nos. 91SA276, 91SA300PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr
In affirming two final agency orders of the Colorado Division of Insurance (the Division), the District Court for the City and County of Denver held that the Division had correctly construed as applying retroactively certain provisions of An Act Concerning the Regulation of the Bail Bond Business, ch. 80, secs. 1-13, 1988 Colo.Sess. Laws 480, 480-84 (the Act), and that the Division’s decision not to renew the professional bail bondsman licenses of the plaintiffs 1 did not constitute an unconstitutional *8retrospective operation of the Act under Article II, Section 11, of the Constitution of the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Doe v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Specialty Restaurants Corp. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- City of Colorado Springs v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.