Legal Opinion

J. Miller Co. v. Mixter

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1971PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

In this workmen’s compensation case, the only question before us is whether at the time he suffered serious injuries the claimant, Samuel E. Mixter, was an *231independent contractor or was an employee of the defendant, J. Miller Company. The referee made an award in favor of the claimant. An appeal was taken by the defendant and compensation carrier to the Workmen’s Compensation Board and this Board affirmed the referee. Thereupon an appeal was taken to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which affirmed the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Feller v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Feller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Herman v. Kandrat Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Universal Am-Can, Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Nevin Trucking v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Budzichowski v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API